Dear #Interns:
Notwithstanding what you may hear from your superiors, #foreskin is NOT a birth defect.
What's a birth defect is aposthia: lack of a foreskin.
Surgery on YOUR child patient INTENDED to mimic a birth defect is inherently #unethical. #mededhttps://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/denmarks-29000-doctors-declare-circumcision-of-healthy_us_58753ec1e4b08052400ee6b3 …
-
-
Replying to @taher_king @WHO
Because
#WHO rightly opposes all#FGM, including Type IV pinprickings & scrapings. No child should be compelled to spread her or his legs to expose her or his genitals to cutting for reasons that aren't strictly therapeutic medical reasons. WHO support for#MGM is indefensible.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
They just oppose things without any research they just go by the sentiments of few people who must have been harmed due to negligence or any other reason and blaming the MC OR FC instead press for banning just because few suffered harm due to negligence .
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taher_king @WHO
Pro-cutters, whether pro-
#FGM or pro-#MGM, all believe the same ludicrous, unsupportable fallacy: "if you're outraged that someone else cut your genitals against your will, it must be for some reason other than the inherently harmful cutting of healthy, erogenous genital tissue."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No I m not outrageous and they are my parents and they would not do. Any thing that would harm there child . Neither any of the parents in this world would ever harm there children's.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I understand that you'd like to think that about yourself, your parents & whoever else you may know who may have cut a child's genitals out of ignorance, but facts are facts. Taking a sharp implement to cut into the healthy tissue from a child's body is inherently harmful. #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.