In 2012, the @AmerAcadPed reviewed the medical literature on male infant #circumcision and concluded that “the benefits aren’t great enough to recommend” it. How is it parents are expected to arrive at a more reasonable conclusion? #i2
-
-
@AmerAcadPeds purposely keeps their circumcision statement as vague as possible. If they put details into it, they would look absolutely insane for saying “the benefits outweigh the risks”.2 replies 3 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @KillTheCut @lucid_purple and
What benefit derived from an unneeded amputation could possibly outweigh the risk of death, however slight? Certainly not marginal decrease in the already low risk of UTI, which is treated non-surgically in any event.
@AmerAcadPeds#tweetiatrician#i2 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2013/03/12/peds.2012-2896.full.pdf …pic.twitter.com/NDFeHRpjrj
2 replies 5 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @Joseph4GI and
Don't forget the rest: http://www.cirp.org/library/death/
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Yes, this list is by no means comprehensive or up-to-date. #tweetiatrician #i2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.