We are always on the look out for new sites when possible and will pass your suggestion on, hopefully one day, we want everyone to join us, more locations the better I say. Dan
-
-
What kind of religious purposes? Don't you think people whose job is "preventing cruelty to children" should be very loudly against an unnecessary infant surgery explicitly designed to cause pain and damage sexuality?pic.twitter.com/WOFlXLdTuz
-
Circumcision for religious purposes
-
Being moronic for religious reasons? Vote here: https://twitter.com/CircumCrippled/status/1060874617953370113 ….
-
All the genital cutting surely isn't being done for the souvenir market. At work we used to call our lead man the "FORESKIN" ... think he may have been collecting them for some ungodly purpose?
-
People don't usually "collect" foreskins so much as "sell them to the highest bidder on the internet"pic.twitter.com/Z10ByxU2Sb
-
I already knew what is done with XS foreskins … was being facetious, as an attention getting tool.
-
And it is done… …for M$$$$$$$$$NNN€€€€YYYY!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, for "religious purposes" like female circumcision, which the NSPCC DEFINITELY has a position on!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If religion can be used to defend the genital mutilation of children, then it can be used to defend the genital mutilation of all children, boys and girls. There are Muslim sects that practice FGM. If we can deny one faith the 'right' to mutilate their children without consent >>
-
2> we must deny that 'right' to all faiths equally, in the goals of protecting children from cruelty. Which is it, allow both, and force children who may not agree with their parents faith to have it carved into their bodies, or protect all infants and children from mutilation?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.