This claim is staggering. Because I wrote an essay arguing that The 1619 Project was great in parts, but was wrong to argue that 1619 was our "true founding," I take exception to it. My essay is here: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/inclusive-case-1776-not-1619/604435/ … Was I duped by "the right" or duping others? A thread: https://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1306941913556283401 …
-
-
-
People like me, who argued in good faith with the ideas that the New York Times Magazine and Nikole Hannah Jones put forth, do not deserve to be tarred as dupes or liars or sloppy for accurately characterizing their original presentation, now that they are walking it back.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Religious?
End of conversation
-
-
-
@nhannahjones is an extraordinarily dishonest person. Compulsive lying on a trumpian levelThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The other (funny?) thing is that 1776 is just flat out overstruck on her profile page... Perhaps it's too on the nose to even consider, but it gave me a good laugh today
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because her and her class of people are just modern day minstrel show artists who appeal to people who are easily led by their emotions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.