This claim is staggering. Because I wrote an essay arguing that The 1619 Project was great in parts, but was wrong to argue that 1619 was our "true founding," I take exception to it. My essay is here: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/inclusive-case-1776-not-1619/604435/ … Was I duped by "the right" or duping others? A thread: https://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1306941913556283401 …
-
-
There is, first, the original display copy: "The 1619 project is a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American Slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding”
Show this thread -
Numerous mainstream and left of center publications, as well as right of center publications, used that characterization *because that is what the NYT Magazine published.* Here is The Nation, not thinking that was factually wrong:pic.twitter.com/hJNK67FfZO
Show this thread -
-
At first I thought, NHJ should just say that the display copy wasn't quite right, and she intended to argue something different. As a journalist I can sympathize with copy written by editors that I wish was just slightly different. It happens! But.
Show this thread -
How do you call other people liars who repeat an easily falsifiable claim when you have characterized the matter this way?pic.twitter.com/tXdbsGqeA2
Show this thread -
-
People like me, who argued in good faith with the ideas that the New York Times Magazine and Nikole Hannah Jones put forth, do not deserve to be tarred as dupes or liars or sloppy for accurately characterizing their original presentation, now that they are walking it back.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
The 1619 Project is starting to become like Springfield in The Simpsons, in that it always possesses whatever attributes are necessary for that particular episode. The project is whatever it needs to be for the person making the argument.
-
...which is kinda sad, because if done differently (with more academic rigor and intellectual honesty) the 1619 concept could have been a wonderful teaching tool and a benchmark series of essays.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.