Funny how antivaccine activists dismiss the possibility of death due to measles (~1 in 1,000) as being of little or no consequence; yet, a one in a million chance of severe reactions to a vaccine is completely unacceptable to them.
How do we factor in risk of debilitating side-effects. There is alarm that the flu vaccine may raise the risk of Dementia... obviously *years* later... and proof near impossible without a lot of twin studies... should we allow people to opt out of the flu vaccine?
-
-
Weird, I've never come across an anti-vaxxer that worked in technology. Usually IT people are smarter than that... even the dumb ones.
-
I’m not anti-vacation... but I do object to mandatory flu vaccinations... but then I’m a chemist first and worked for multiple pharma companies... plus worked with clinical trials approvals, etc... so I might have a leas black&white view than you
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Citation very badly needed, from a peer-reviewed journal. Do be a dear and check that it wasn't from one of those fringe anti-vax groups who later had to retract it. Thanks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't, because there aren't any. Your bullshit is killing people.
-
Me not taking the flu vaccine every year is really killing people? Especially if I am responsible and do not expose others in the event of having the flu? Check yourself. My gripe is with proposed *mandatory* annual flu vaccinations *as a condition of continued employment*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s what is known in scientific circles as “unadulterated bullshit.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.