Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
computingnature's profile
Carsen Stringer
Carsen Stringer
Carsen Stringer
@computingnature

Tweets

Carsen Stringer

@computingnature

neuroscientist @HHMIJanelia, thinking about thinking 🔬| @UCL and @PittTweet alum | diversity and openscience for better science | Ⓥ

Ashburn, VA
gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/~cstringer
Joined June 2016

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

    Thread: A picture is worth a thousand words, and your brain needs billions of neurons to process it. Why do we need so many neurons? To find out, we recorded thousands of them in mouse visual cortex. Here’s some data, and a link to the paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/07/22/374090 …pic.twitter.com/fnfySyoEH0

    6:37 AM - 22 Jul 2018
    • 199 Retweets
    • 455 Likes
    • Sandeep Kishore Miles Evangelista was? Polina Rusina Kate Iv. Adam Savitt Marta Slashcheva Emily Muller Steffen Schneider
    8 replies 199 retweets 455 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        2. One reason to have so many neurons may be that they each have different jobs: Neuron A recognizes the pointedness of a fox’s ears, Neuron B recognizes the color of the fox’s fur. Neuron C recognizes a fox nose, etcpic.twitter.com/1t5hOn1WKn

        1 reply 2 retweets 20 likes
        Show this thread
      3. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        3. When enough of these neurons activate, the brain as a whole can recognize a fox.pic.twitter.com/ZVk3zPj0YS

        1 reply 2 retweets 17 likes
        Show this thread
      4. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        4. What if some neurons “fall asleep” on the job and don’t respond to the image? This actually happens very often, and yet the brain is remarkably robust to these failures.

        1 reply 4 retweets 18 likes
        Show this thread
      5. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        5. Even if 90% of the neurons don’t do their job, we can still recognize the fox. Even if we randomly change 90% of the pixels, we can still recognize the fox. The brain is robust to a lot of manipulations like that.pic.twitter.com/7oi9bOm9UL

        1 reply 5 retweets 24 likes
        Show this thread
      6. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        6. Artificial neural networks also use millions of neurons to recognize images.pic.twitter.com/sOY5Emm3Qa

        1 reply 3 retweets 15 likes
        Show this thread
      7. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        7. Unlike brains, machines are not so robust to small aberrations. Here is our fox and next to it the same fox very slightly modified and now the machine thinks it’s a puffer fish!pic.twitter.com/Bd9ZDyY7QJ

        4 replies 7 retweets 28 likes
        Show this thread
      8. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        8. These are called “adversarial images”, because we devised them to fool the machine. How does the brain protect against these perturbations and others?

        2 replies 4 retweets 21 likes
        Show this thread
      9. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        9. One protection could be to make many slightly different copies of the neurons that represent foxes. Even if some neurons fall asleep on the job, their copies might still activate.

        1 reply 3 retweets 20 likes
        Show this thread
      10. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        10. However, if the brain used so many neurons for every single image, we would quickly run out of neurons!

        1 reply 2 retweets 13 likes
        Show this thread
      11. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        11. This results in an evolutionary pressure: it’s good to have many neurons do very different jobs so we can recognize lots of objects in images, but it’s also good if they share some responsibilities, so they can pick up the slack when necessary.

        1 reply 3 retweets 20 likes
        Show this thread
      12. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        12. We found evidence for this by investigating the main dimensions of variation in the responses of 10,000 neurons. Below, each column is one neuron’s responses to several of our images.pic.twitter.com/UZqDjTaKv4

        2 replies 5 retweets 19 likes
        Show this thread
      13. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        13. The largest two dimensions were distributed broadly across all neurons, as you see below. Any neuron could contribute to these and pick up the slack if the other neurons did not respond.pic.twitter.com/AtES0KSNR1

        1 reply 4 retweets 21 likes
        Show this thread
      14. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        14. The next 8 dimensions each were smaller and distributed more sparsely across neurons. If a neuron was asleep, it was still likely a few others could represent these dimensions in its place.pic.twitter.com/7Dqnes6lUQ

        1 reply 3 retweets 16 likes
        Show this thread
      15. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        15. The next 30 dimensions revealed ever more intricate structure...pic.twitter.com/v8dZtUJgbp

        1 reply 2 retweets 17 likes
        Show this thread
      16. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        16. And so did the next 160 dimensions...pic.twitter.com/rlEpkoOIMi

        2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes
        Show this thread
      17. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        17. And so on, this kept on going, with the N-th dimension being about N times smaller than the biggest dimension.

        1 reply 2 retweets 13 likes
        Show this thread
      18. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        18. This distribution of activity is called a “power-law”.pic.twitter.com/IiWTda0nwI

        1 reply 5 retweets 16 likes
        Show this thread
      19. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        19. However, this was not just any power-law, it had a special exponent of approx 1. We did some math and showed that a power-law with this exponent must be borderline fractal.

        1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes
        Show this thread
      20. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        20. A fractal is a mathematical object that has structure at many different spatial scales, like the Mandelbrot set below:pic.twitter.com/WTARMWiym4

        1 reply 3 retweets 16 likes
        Show this thread
      21. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        21. This Inceptionism movie is also a kind of fractal:pic.twitter.com/icQEakUayT

        1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes
        Show this thread
      22. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        22. The neural activity was so close to being a fractal, and just barely avoided it because it’s exponent was 1.04, not 1 or smaller.

        1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes
        Show this thread
      23. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        23. An exponent of 1.04 is the sweet spot: as high-dimensional as possible without being a fractal.

        1 reply 5 retweets 23 likes
        Show this thread
      24. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        24. Not being a fractal allows neural responses to be continuous and smooth, which are the minimal protections neurons need so that we don’t confuse a fox with a puffer fish!

        3 replies 7 retweets 42 likes
        Show this thread
      25. Carsen Stringer‏ @computingnature 22 Jul 2018

        All the neural data is available here: https://figshare.com/articles/Recordings_of_ten_thousand_neurons_in_visual_cortex_in_response_to_2_800_natural_images/6845348 … And the code is here:https://github.com/MouseLand/stringer-pachitariu-et-al-2018b …

        0 replies 10 retweets 56 likes
        Show this thread
      26. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2019 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info