I think they're defining "progressive" in the pretty bizarre way to get that result, fwiw. BLM is a progressive movement, for example.
-
-
-
Good point. Looking at the original paper, “Membership in these tribes was determined by each individual’s answers to a subset of 58 core belief and behavioral questions that were asked together with the rest of the survey.” …I don’t see anywhere the exact rule is explained(!?)
-
But taking segments based on “core belief and behavioral questions” and then labeling them with political descriptors sounds like a dubious methodology. The arbitrary choice of names as well as the choice of segmentation itself give the authors a lot of freedom to ‘tell a story’.
-
Yup. Some tells from the first page of the actual linked whitepaper, without even reading the data: - "tribalism" is pretty exclusively used by the right-wing - their "director of research" is a PR guy and a former Republican congressional intern (https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephen-hawkins-0b42a213/ …)
-
makes sense. though, I personally think tribalism is a major factor in politics and explains a lot of the support for Trump
-
Polarization is a big factor in modern American political life, but mostly leftists don't talk about "tribalism" (not least because it vastly misunderstands what tribes are, and pisses off indigenous people).
-
Well, it is not just polarization I’m referring to, i.e. beliefs becoming more separated. It’s more specifically the “us vs. them” feeling, where you identify with your party like a sports team, and want them to “win” and the other team to “lose” regardless of policy specifics.
-
Right. And there are a lot of ways to express that but "tribalism" isn't actually a useful one. And it really has been thoroughly co-opted by right-wingers who think people not liking them is "uncivil".
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.