RT @tqbf: It’s not crazy for OpenSSL to redesign and simplify its CSPRNG. It is silly to make it MORE complicated. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3758 …
-
-
I offered to PR a fork-safe DRBG that we've formally verified, but bad faith from poisonous lunatics on openssl-prng made me give up.
3 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
I think it's a different world now. Please get in touch. And I'm sorry.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Have you considered whether maybe a CSPRNG is better delivered via a librandom (a la libpcap) than as something integrated into OpenSSL?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
A persistent error of the ages is seeing "random() % n", or "nextFloat() * n". The world needs a solid "random(int max)".
3:45 PM - 28 Jun 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.