@BenLaurie @agl if CAs are too-big-to-fail, should TLS use m-of-n certificates for redundancy? E.g. server_cert with 3 ECDSA certs.
It's a lot of legal work for BigCo's to vet a provider and their terms, that's what I'm thinking of too.
-
-
They wouldn't give a script a blank check, and probably wouldn't do the work to negotiate a "just in case" provider.
-
surely n for auto-renewal need be no larger than n for m-of-n - and probably smaller?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.