@BenLaurie @agl if CAs are too-big-to-fail, should TLS use m-of-n certificates for redundancy? E.g. server_cert with 3 ECDSA certs.
That works too, but maybe is cartelism. m-of-n might be better at letting a market work. .
-
-
I would assume the panel would consist of all CAs in the main root stores that accept the protocol(s).
-
It's a lot of legal work for BigCo's to vet a provider and their terms, that's what I'm thinking of too.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.