The apps I've seen, like the Apple/Google one, would have enough correlation info to identify super-spreaders retrospectively. Though it would also alert some people unnecessarily.https://twitter.com/Pinboard/status/1263611492017958912 …
But it'd help figure all of those possibilities out too. Ultimately it's a recording of infection pairings. Infected persons can still be interviewed, their histories traced, etc. It's easy to build an infection proximity graph too.
-
-
Easier to just collect the data upstream, the way we already do
-
Why not both? The bluetooth data gives much more granular physical proximity data; ~10cm fidelity. Nothing else I know of can duplicate that.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.