"Does anybody believe that 128 bits of randomness is a good basis for a long-term secure key?" Yes, I believe this. *sigh*https://twitter.com/hanno/status/1174018873634557954 …
-
-
Why are we vending non-secure from the kernel though? Mersenne twister is like 2 lines of code if all you want to do is hunt the wumpus with it.
-
You know, I never understood why me seeding a Mersin next twister with a legit entropy source (like background radiation from a cellular chip) didn’t pass the muster for a security review. I still don’t understand it actually.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Cryptographically strong randomness may be important for protecting ML systems exposed to public data, too. Guessable sampling choices could enable algorithm manipulation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.