Noah Gibbs

So, your point is RMS' decades of mistreating women, and advocacy of pedophilia, is an acceptable price to pay for his decades of damaging Free Software?

"advocacy of pedophilia" Could you point me towards sources where Stallman advocates pedophilia?

When they say that, they mean the bit where he talks about consent being the big thing, and pedophilia and necrophilia are "okay if consensual." Which, in the modern world, is a pretty pro-pedophilia and pro-necrophilia stance.

He used the p word a few times in his "blog" (political notes). Using this word is really giving the stick to be beaten with. When he talks about "voluntary p..." I guess he just means "consensual sex between teenagers". I'm really not convinced he was doing the apology of crime.

He had a list of crimes there, not just the two I mention. And even in context, quotes like "for incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid the risk of inbreeding" isn't (IMHO) particularly unclear. And that's only one of several posts by him.

You are really confused. The whole cancel crowd is clueless. You are equating "expressing ideas that disturb you" is not the same as "inciting to commit crime" which is not "committing crime". Can you fathom that expressing ideas or arguing is different from committing a crime?

«Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.»

What's the next step? Hanging him for thoughtcrime?