We aren’t afraid of you Russian pussies. You support someone who uses chemical warfare on its own ppl but that doesn’t surprise me considering Russia poisons their own people.
-
-
-
you do realize we cant shoot down there nuclear missiles right? they have more missiles than we have anti missile measures.. which are only like 10% effective on a good day..russia could wipe the u.s. off the map over night. our only course of action would be to wipe them out too
-
Oh yeah did you create our nations defense system? Mad props man
-
Lmao this guy has no clue what we really have




-
Which guy? The one talking about how we don’t have a reliable missile defense system? He’s correct. We don’t. There’s only mutually assured destruction.
-
"If funding for the THAAD-ER begins in 2018, a system could be produced by 2022 "
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This cute little flirtation between trump and Putin is adorable
-
They're both playing hard to get but we see through then
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's almost like there will be consequences for electing an internet steak salesman to run a country.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Somebody needs to stop these atrocities. US, UK and France are targeting chemical weapons storage and that’s the least they could do to curb Assad to perpetrate the cruelty.
-
Maybe we should have allowed more than 11 refugees into our country over the last year then. It would have saved lives. Isn’t this the Pro-Life Party?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Pee pee tape?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Short of deploying a nuclear attack, what more can Russia do to us? They've already hit us with a cyberattack and stuck us with 45* as our "leader."
-
I did see reports last night that US Cyber Comm was on high alert, and I believe it was Mattie who said to be prepared for heightened disinformation campaigns. I think the false news narrative that led us to Trump has been more crippling than a nuclear strike.
-
At least then the survivors would have a clear enemy. I understand questioning news and looking at multiple sources; this new trend of calling it fake news if it’s the narrative you don’t like or just assuming certain networks are always false is stomach churning to say the least
-
It’s a tactic devoid of intelligence or courage. It’s the first refuge of those lacking the ability to battle it out intellectually.
-
Agreed. And often it isn’t just an unwillingness, it’s an inability. You can’t even argue against real fake news if you can’t self-determine what sites are credible. I grew up with the internet and to me it seems pretty easy to determine if InfoWars or CNN has more credibility
-
And even on Twitter it shouldn’t be hard to figure out if someone has a credible background for news or if they’re making stuff up. I personally don’t report news on here, I retweet it because I’m not a credible source of news - but I can still be a credible spreader of news
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.