Prove it. Show us links to being false?
-
-
-
So false he stepped down as the lead investigator!!
-
He is still head of Intel committee so if he did something wrong he would have stepped down
-
He did, he lied and he's not leading the investigation anymore. Still in the committee but not investigating
-
There is no Russia story so he knows it is a waste of time.. it is a complete fabrication of the Democrats
-
Riiiigghhtt.
-
Lol now it's 7 layer chess, amirite?

- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
NO specific GOP or Dem names given. Just "sources". CNN trying to run interference for Susan "Dirty" Rice?
#LSMsucks
-
Same anonymous sources who said it did happen, right?
-
If I understand you correctly, Evelyn Farkas would be surprised to find she's anonymous right?
-
Your genius Spicer misquoted Evelyn Farkas (per her). I recommend you try to get these little things called facts cupcake
-
So you're saying he met with Evelyn Farkas at the WH? Surprising Spicey would misquote someone.
#MRGA, comrades! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Democrat sources. That's a step below the usual anonymous "senior official" rubbish you guys report.
-
Another Trump fluffer that can't read. Care to try again?
-
Oh right, I see that now. Who are the sources?
-
Nunes made the claims. He carries the burden of proof here.
-
Who are the sources contradicting him?
-
Let's try this. If you knew, would it make any difference? Believe what you wish, friend. The truth will eventually be known.
-
I hope so. Nunes revealed to much under his own name & had to shut up. Meanwhile unnamed "sources" leak & MSM features 1-word "quotes".
-
Trump could just declassify these documents and air it all out. But he'd rather have people think there is secret evidence vindicating him.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.