Well if you can't beat em just change the rules and win that way...seems a little flawed.
-
-
-
It's worked for them in the past.
-
Dems did it with all non-SCOTUS appointees in 2013 when they had Senate. This has been a long time comin'
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
A WH under criminal investigation should be indicted, not appointing SC Justices to lifetime positions. Delay confirmation now!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Repugs are full of
. They blocked Obama every step of the way. Now they want to change the rules. Hypocrites! -
It will bite them when we take the Senate and we can pass thing's with a simple majority
-
2018 can’t come quick enough!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Change the rules of the game so you win Sounds like a spoiled child who wants to win at all costs#destruction democracy
-
Not to mention they wouldn't even give Garland a hearing!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Rebuplicans have no reason to cry for bipartisanship since they blocked Judge Garland from getting a vote on the floor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apparently the GOP has forgotten how many times they filibustered Obama
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Reid changed the rules in 2013. If it works for one side, why not the other
#nuclearoptionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This guy is not worth a rule change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So unfair that a fake and temporary President gets a lifetime appointment to SCOTUS
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@POTUS winning streak goes from strength to strength. Sick of winning yet Mr President. The nuclear option will bite where sun don't shine.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.