he hates america
-
-
-
if people can sue Saudi Arabi for acts of terrorism, others could they would sue us. And we have done a lot wrong
-
the victims of 9/11. Deserve justice.
-
they do. But this will lead to a lot of problems. Money isnt gonna bring the victims back
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
obviously, you can't sue a country for the actions of a terrorist group. Or else people would sue the US for arming the Taliban
-
the Saudi government sheltered terrorists
-
And we armed them to "fight the soviets". What's the difference? Which is why this would be a bad law.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you think this is good?
-
it opens the door for people who have been killed by US actions to sue the US government and Saudi
-
Ok, are you sure it allows lawsuits from foreign soil to here? If so I'd say a veto was a good choice.
-
strikes and other acts killed thousands of innocent people as terrorism or war crimes etc. etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Why do you think this is good?
-
do overseas. If this law is broken, the US would get sued more than any other country.
-
Thanks for the response, I didn't know that.
-
it's new to my knowledge as well. I didn't think to learn this until this bill became, for lack of better word, popular.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
@SecureAmerica Who didnt see that coming?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good. The terrorists don't represent the entire country.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
stupid bill. How many Iraqis/Syrians could sue US for all the drone strikes that "accidently" killed innocent people?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.