@cnnbrk don't do it...our wildlife is going to be completely gone...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@tiana_bryant24@mlouden87 The phrase "at carrying capacity for bears" implies they will starve in that ecosystem otherwise. You want that? -
Tweet unavailable
-
@tiana_bryant24 To another saturated ecosystem, where they're unfamiliar with the landscape and could subsequently struggle to forage? -
Tweet unavailable
-
@tiana_bryant24 Grizzlies are apex predators, meaning that animals lower in the food chain will suffer if their population isn't controlled.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@cnnbrk I don't think they should be removed from the list. I don't think 700 bears mean there not endangered.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cnnbrk why hunt these beautiful beasts ??Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cnnbrk "dislike"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cnnbrk I propose that we turn to the Constitution and invoke our right to arm bears.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cnnbrk "hunt" ... ok, hand to paw only, NO weapons unless the bears get some alsoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cnnbrk so their still endangered big their going to remove the label so they can be hunted. That's ridiculous!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cnnbrk So hunters can get their guns and make them endangered AGAIN!! This is unbelievable..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cnnbrk No No No !Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.