Why the rush, @GOP?
-
-
-
WHY 36 YEARS LATER!
-
Because women are conditioned to keep things like that to ourselves. It takes a lot of courage for her to speak up.
-
No, she’s making it harder for ACTUAL victims of sexual assault to come forward for fear of not being believed.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It is a scandal that some in Congress still aren’t demanding an FBI investigation. How are we going to know the truth if we don’t hear from the witnesses?
-
There's already been investigations. 6 of them! And of what little witness info she has provided, THEY ALL DENIED THE PARTY OCCURRED AND HAVE STEPPED UP TO VOUCH FOR KAVANAUGH'S CHARACTER. STOP ACTING LIKE YOU REALLY REALLY REALLY NEED HER STORY TO BE TRUE. THAT'S JUST SICK
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There needs to be severe consequences for this woman if she is lying.
-
And some for him
-
Expand on that, the tweet was if SHE is lying...what does "and some for him" mean? Typical libtard head hunt. I bet you are glad the Senate did not impeach Clinton too huh? No hypocrisy there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stop stalling
-
You’re speaking of a sexual assault victim. Stop sucking.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I agree 100%, BS
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why are the Republicans in such a hurry to get the SCOTUS vacancy filled? They sure weren’t in any hurry when they ferociously obstructed Merrick Garland from even having a hearing for nearly a year.
-
Because they’re better politicians than the democrats...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We are hearing nothing, I don’t believe this Professor’s story. If she was so concerned why didn’t she say something years ago. I don’t believe her and a lot of people don’t.
-
You’ve obviously never been sexually abused!!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.