To be fair, even an assembly programmer has to take on faith that, say, a multiplication instruction is being executed reasonably by the hardware: IEEE 754 had to be developed for this very reason.
-
-
-
There's no need to stop at assembly
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is why I still tell people to start with basic. It quickly becomes limiting and will force you to use logical operations and math to overcome it. Then you move to assembly then C.
-
looking at assembly listing really fixed that for me.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
After all the optimizer does to your code, are you sure you know?
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I don't think knowledge of any coding language gives you complete perspective of how code runs. From running a script to seeing the results, there is an incredible amount happening that we are all ignorant of. You don't need to know where the electrons are
-
All I'll suggest is that understanding or being aware of basic functionality of tomasulo, oooe, cache systems assembly, calling conventions, jit processing and underlying code helps. A lot.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
this applies to regexp too :D
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Are you sure he wasn't confusing you with a Holy-C programmer?
-
*HolyC
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.