But now it is clear it is definitely not about that, at least not on social media :)
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori @pervognsen
It is the opposite of that, it is about rampant demonization of a wide variety of ideas and behaviors.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
Even civil libertarians "demonize" (or strongly criticize to use a less loaded term) ideas and behaviors they consider sufficiently harmful.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pervognsen @cmuratori
I don't think "it's about that". It's a tactic aimed at certain ends. It may be ineffective or counterproductive, but that's what it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pervognsen @cmuratori
Public policing of language/tone has been a successful part of the civil rights and beyond. So it's hard not to support the general idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen @cmuratori
And if that's your starting point, it becomes an internal discussion about what's rhetorically and strategically effective.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
I don't agree with that (where "that" is all of that). I am not an "ends justify the means" person, I am a "the means are the end" person.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @pervognsen
What you're talking about aren't "tactics", they are _the actual reality of living in the world_ that we all have to deal with.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
I mean, for example, the tactic that publicly telling people off for expressing certain views is effective at reducing those views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
Well, first off, how are we measuring that assertion? And second, it also has lots of other real, negative effects.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
At this point it has real chilling effects on people's speech, and their behavior.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.