Actually looking at the IMDB it looks like it actually _is_ amateur hour??
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori @whilesoftware
Like the director has never done even a medium-budget film before AFAICT?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
the second play through was painful. i think i'm beginning to see what you're talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @whilesoftware
Almost every scene they show looks like it was shot in isolation on a small set. It's really weird.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori @whilesoftware
I'm guessing maybe there's a lot of green screen, and very few actors, and not enough CG budget, or something?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori @whilesoftware
It's real weird. You don't normally see a > $100 million movie looking so spare.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
he directed macbeth, which doesn't seem to have that low budget feel (similar cast too)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sjaay
Just comparing trailer to trailer, Macbeth still looks pretty low budget, but strangely higher budget than Creed...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @sjaay
... considering Creed is ten times the budget!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori @sjaay
was the video quality low? That can make the compositing look unconvincing and hence cheap.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It was more the shot blocking than anything else. Every shot was a few people in an empty, lifeless room!
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori @brianwill
there is a flatness to it. lacks depth i guess
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.