Why doesn't the C++ committee just add something to the spec that states that under/overflows must do whatever the target CPU's behavior is?
-
-
@cmuratori hear you & agree, but i mean taking 32- or 64-bit code to other CPUs - i would have /many/ more loc to examine. -
@cmuratori i mean maybe it would *force* me to look at all the loc like i should anyway because of inconsitent compilers? :) - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.