Why doesn't the C++ committee just add something to the spec that states that under/overflows must do whatever the target CPU's behavior is?
@natbro No, it wouldn't - it would make it _much easier_. Because, for example, all x64 targets would behave the same!
-
-
@cmuratori@natbro Currently all x64 targets differ because their compilers do different things with "undefined"! -
@cmuratori@natbro So saying that the CPU is in charge makes porting _more_ likely to work than it does now. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.