Why doesn't the C++ committee just add something to the spec that states that under/overflows must do whatever the target CPU's behavior is?
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori It seems really obvious to me that instead of leaving things up the _compiler_, it should instead be up to the _cpu_.1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Because that's what the programmer is actually trying to program, and any undefined behavior should _pass through_.2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.