Why doesn't the C++ committee just add something to the spec that states that under/overflows must do whatever the target CPU's behavior is?
-
-
@cmuratori yikes, this would make porting about 6.022x10^23 worse than it already is. but if you don't care about porting, yeah that's it. -
@natbro@cmuratori I don't see that it follows. gcc etc. seems to be trying to pretend that no targets do something that in fact all... [1] - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cmuratori forwarded to EWG. - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.