Why doesn't the C++ committee just add something to the spec that states that under/overflows must do whatever the target CPU's behavior is?
-
-
@cmuratori Because that's what the programmer is actually trying to program, and any undefined behavior should _pass through_. -
@cmuratori yikes, this would make porting about 6.022x10^23 worse than it already is. but if you don't care about porting, yeah that's it. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.