@pervognsen Hahahahaha...
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori This algebraic framework is actually way nicer to calculate with than the set-theoretic stuff I wrote up earlier.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
@cmuratori Let me redo the first example to show you what I mean.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
-
Replying to @pervognsen
@cmuratori I.e. just apply the distributive rule recursively.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
@pervognsen So effectively the LHS of that is really a vector, once you start having multiple productions, yes?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori In the algebraic framework, it's a system of equations. I guess you can think of it as a single vector equation if you like.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
@cmuratori Actually, yeah, that's a good idea because you then have a "transfer matrix".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
@pervognsen@cmuratori Or, I guess you need several matrices since it's not linear but polynomial. Hmm.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
@pervognsen@cmuratori I fail at following tweets. Left recursion in grammars?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@marc_b_reynolds @pervognsen It got a little out of hand, it's true.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.