@EthanBierlein @cmuratori @Jonathan_Blow hmm, in my lang: "arr=(new int[256])-1;" then 1 is the first index... "arr--;" would also work...
@cr88192 @EthanBierlein @Jonathan_Blow That's what I said in the first post (keep the pointer to the base pointing one element behind).
-
-
@cmuratori @EthanBierlein@Jonathan_Blow granted, but here is due to array offsetting rather than support for explicit 1-based arrays... -
@cmuratori @EthanBierlein@Jonathan_Blow ex: a mechanism designed to preserve some of the "look and feel" of C pointer math, but "safer"... - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.