@cmuratori Like for a static site that's really bad obviously, but for say some random image somebody linked on their Facebook feed, sure!
@rygorous I'm not sure why you keep talking about separate files? Nobody is talking about that? At least I am not?
-
-
@cmuratori@rygorous I'm just talking about the fact that if you want to ensure "1 physical IO per image", then that's very hard to do. -
@cmuratori@rygorous In fact it may actually be impossible if you can't cap the image size, etc. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cmuratori They switched from "one on-disk file per photo" to "append-only PAK file". That's what the paper describes. -
@cmuratori They assume a workload with random(-ish) requests coming in, and individual files dropping out of cache between accesses to them. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.