@cmuratori "just admitted"? April 2015.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Koitenshin@nothings It's probably quite high :(Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@thegrugq NO that was about microsopic hair analysis, not about DNA evidence. Exonerated by DNA, sometimes after 30y behind bars.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@daveaitel The same folks also lost 20.5 million OPM records because they do not use ENCRYPTIONpic.twitter.com/RUQPnsJXCA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@macdrifter perjury? And the sentence is...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori such a click-bait tweet. They admitted to a poor process and bad "science", not lying.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori @Babrooster@washingtonpost technically the article points subjective comparative hair matching, not necessarily DNA testingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@drgitlin@cmuratori Agree that the specific issue of what was misrepresented isn’t accurate, but point still stands.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@drgitlin@cmuratori Right, the point is FBI lied, not “science is bad.”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@dtipson FTR this was hair analysis, very different from DNA, hair analysis is junk science. DNA is real.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.