@nothings @jwatte @cmuratori @thorduragust you see any value in passing static arrays by ref; to pass length? Ex: f(int (&a)[16]) { ... }
-
-
Replying to @ChrisG0x20
@ChrisG0x20@jwatte@cmuratori@thorduragust Does that actually require length to match, unlike non-ref array? (I'm not a C++ expert. :)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@nothings@ChrisG0x20@cmuratori@thorduragust You cab use a template that deduces the length!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jwatte
@jwatte@ChrisG0x20@cmuratori@thorduragust That's only interesting if you're using templates, which I wouldn't be, so not part of question1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@nothings@ChrisG0x20@cmuratori@thorduragust Why do you insist on not using totally usable language parts? You don't /have/ to abuse them!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jwatte
@jwatte@nothings@ChrisG0x20@thorduragust He programs in C. Templates don't exist in the language he programs in.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@nothings@ChrisG0x20@thorduragust There exists zero current mainstream compilers that do only C, not C++. My question stands.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jwatte
@jwatte@nothings@ChrisG0x20@thorduragust Jon, hopefully you can think of many reasons why the _availability_ of a language isn't related?3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@jwatte@nothings@ChrisG0x20@thorduragust Maybe Sean wants to keep his code easy to write a compiler for.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@jwatte@nothings@ChrisG0x20@thorduragust Maybe he's had ample experience in the past with C compilers being faster than C++.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@cmuratori @jwatte @nothings @ChrisG0x20 @thorduragust ETc., etc., etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.