@cmuratori @ssylvan @nothings @pascient The browser still seems to pick the 2x version even if the 1x is the right width :(
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ssylvan@nothings@pascient Not sure if this is an off-by-one error for them, maybe?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ssylvan@nothings@pascient But it does at least mean that the 1024x1024 isn't getting chosen - the 256x256 is, now.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ssylvan@nothings@pascient But it _should_ be the 128x128 :(1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@nothings@pascient FYI your W/H in the img elem is 128x128. Maybe if not exact size it rounds up to next 2x for nyquist reasons?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ssylvan
@cmuratori@nothings@pascient sorry 108x108, not 128x1281 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ssylvan@nothings@pascient But that is not the one to look at for the off-by-one part. The header image is 640px exactly...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ssylvan@nothings@pascient ... and the width is specified as 640px, and it _still_ picks 1280px.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ssylvan@nothings@pascient don’t you just *love* the web.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MysticWren @ssylvan @nothings @pascient For suitably "want to see it die in a horrific fire" definitions of the word "love" :P
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.