@ricomariani I think you don't understand the difference between a fact and an example.
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani Stating that it is a "fact" that the same algorithm gets bigger in 64-bit compared to 32-bit means it's always true.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani This is obviously false, if you think about it even cursorily.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani It is not difficult to construct a register-dependent algorithm that is bigger in x86 than in x64.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani Similarly, it is equivalently false, _and even usually false_, that the same algorithm is _slower_.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani This is again because of register spilling.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani So while you can go right ahead showing _examples_ of times when this is not true...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani ... if you don't know the difference between an example and a fact, I'm not sure what to say to you.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani And I would further point out that since Visual Studio is one of the _least_ performant things I use...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ricomariani ... I am inclined to say that it could have used a more thorough approach to performance overall...4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@cmuratori @ricomariani ... and if that had been done, 64-bit wouldn't have looked like such a non-win.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.