@cmuratori Holy shit.
-
-
Replying to @tom_forsyth
@tom_forsyth Yeah. Turns out I wasn't nuts in thinking the anamorphic projection shouldn't elongate bokeh vertically.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@tom_forsyth The bokeh is vertically elongated _because the fucking lens has an oval aperture_!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@tom_forsyth So the fact that anamorphic actually _compresses_ vertically is counteracted by the fact that the bokeh starts out oval!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@tom_forsyth doesn't the aperture only appear oval because you are looking through an anamorphic lens?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @won3d
@won3d@tom_forsyth Then I am still confused!! Why does the bokeh elongate in the opposite direction of the image??1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@won3d@tom_forsyth Clearly I need to get out a notebook, because that makes no sense to me :( OH WAIT...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@won3d@tom_forsyth No maybe it does make sense to me - the reason is because it's _traveling further_ than the focal plane?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@won3d@tom_forsyth That would seem to imply though that near-field bokeh would be elongated horizontally...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@tom_forsyth oh thats an interesting thought...but I have to sleep now!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@won3d @tom_forsyth I WILL GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS SHITE.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.