@cmuratori @Jonathan_Blow @AllenWebster4th how is that better than the emacs way? (writting a single and portable elisp line per keybinding)
-
-
Replying to @ocivitf
@ocivitf@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th Because all of my code is in C, so I want to write my stuff in C, not ELISP.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@ocivitf@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th Also, it has a real debugger, which is really the most important part (ELISP doesn't).1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th sure, I can agree with that for full extensions, but keybindings in a dll looks overkill to me1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ocivitf
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th unless it can be written and built in a portable way from within the editor itself, IMHO.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ocivitf
@ocivitf@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th For lightweight users, you could obviously add a special config file for this later.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@ocivitf@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th But any serious user is going to want to do heavier customization than keybindings.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@ocivitf@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th Plus it _is_ portable to build, it doesn't use any platform-specific C. So you don't rewrite it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@ocivitf@Jonathan_Blow@AllenWebster4th In theory, you could even load the DLL on Mac/Linux without recompiling it... it's possible.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@ocivitf@Jonathan_Blow In reality, I have a already DLL loader for exactly this purpose.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@AllenWebster4th @ocivitf @Jonathan_Blow That is pretty baller.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.