@Jonathan_Blow Yeah I feel like that is just a stupid special case of having the actual thing you want, which is scope merging.
@Jonathan_Blow You want to do:
foo(scope bar X, scope baz Y)
and now members of X and members of Y are just automatically matched.
-
-
@Jonathan_Blow There's literally no reason I can think of why you would tie this to some "primal" class except OOP bullshit. -
@Jonathan_Blow It's way better if you can just merge scopes from everywhere you want. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow My argument here is you have to remember "foo" you don't need to with member functionsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow if im remembering your language correctly couldn't you do whatever(vec3 a){ using a; x += 10; } -
@cmuratori@Jonathan_Blow functionally how is that different from a member function other than calling syntax?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.