@rygorous @Jonathan_Blow ...like, "yeah, that makes a lot of sense what you're saying, but no"
-
-
Replying to @checker
@checker@Jonathan_Blow a) Lawyers work within the framework they're given. If "no X" is a hard constraint, they'll obey it.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rygorous
@checker@Jonathan_Blow (They won't negotiate X away though if there's any option not to, because from their PoV, it's hurting their client)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rygorous
@checker@Jonathan_Blow b) My hypothesis is that the fundamental problem with in-house legal counsel is that they find ways to keep busy.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rygorous
@rygorous@checker@Jonathan_Blow I also heard that theory from@cmuratori and it fits all the available data. Always rent lawyers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tom_forsyth
@tom_forsyth@rygorous@checker@Jonathan_Blow My theory was definitely broader than that - it was Jeff who boiled it down to lawyers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@tom_forsyth@rygorous@checker@Jonathan_Blow I explained my original theory in detail here: http://mollyrocket.com/jacs/jacs_0001_0017.html …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@tom_forsyth@rygorous@checker@Jonathan_Blow And then later (possible on a podcast? Can't remember) I expanded it to be...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@tom_forsyth@rygorous@checker@Jonathan_Blow ... "once you create a system for doing something, that something will get as big as it can."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@tom_forsyth@rygorous@checker@Jonathan_Blow I think I talk about it in Season 3, and definitely again in Season 4.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@tom_forsyth @rygorous @checker @Jonathan_Blow But I'm pretty sure I never said anything about lawyers. That was all Jeff. He's right tho :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.