Finally switching over to terse types, like Jeff uses. Really like them. s32/u32 is nicer than int32/uint32. Shoulda switched long ago!
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Yes please. There are no better names than those for integers!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bionicbeagle
@bionicbeagle@ocornut I did take the controversial step of naming s8/u8 as s08/u08 so they would be the same number of characters...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@bionicbeagle@ocornut Not sure how everyone feels about that :) u08 u16 u32 u64 s08 s16 s32 s64 r32 r64 b08 b16 b32 b645 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@bionicbeagle@ocornut Just out of curiosity, what purpose do the larger boolean types serve (alignment?).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AMadan4
@AMadan4@bionicbeagle@ocornut Sometimes a boolean is just to big to be confined to a scant eight bits, man!!!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@AMadan4@bionicbeagle@ocornut (but in all seriousness, yes - it's a notational convenience so people know what is and isn't boolean...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@AMadan4 @bionicbeagle @ocornut ... but still be able to control exactly how big the types are supposed to be)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.