@taradinoc @Dravorek The Supreme Court never heard any of these arguments, they granted cert only on the false advertising portion.
@taradinoc @Dravorek All that is talking about is the fact that copyright requires originality. The argument here is that it was not.
-
-
@taradinoc@Dravorek Ie., because the code in this case was designed _solely_ to authenticate the cartridge, it was not original. -
@taradinoc@Dravorek If it had _actually_ been an API, with real work behind it and it was designed to do something, it's different. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.