@cmuratori Only real with a zip of almond milk!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori We did not have time to investigate it fully but it looks like the compiler was able to mod the loop once the inlines were gone. -
@cmuratori So, yeah, "zero cost abstraction" isn't even true in the case of inline functions that do nothing but cast or multiply numbers. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@timrlaw But the function is a one-line inline function? Why would IPO even be involved? There is only one procedure in both cases!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@timrlaw We only have one compilation unit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@timrlaw Is this thing on? TESTING TESTING... 1... 2... OK, let's try again: "We only have one compilation unit."
-
@timrlaw But yeah, I don't disagree we should try turning it on. Maybe they accidentally turn off some same-unit opts if it is off.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rjobling@cmuratori 2012. Hm. Noticed this a while ago by accident, maybe it was a special header file? In that case, ignore what I said.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rjobling@rygorous@cmuratori Try using dvec.h for the operator overloading. At least MSDN says they are there. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/kcwz153a(v=vs.90).aspx … -
@immojobojo@rjobling@cmuratori Ah, indeed, thanks! That must've been included from somewhere else. :) - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.