.@cmuratori @dmmfix "granny_vertex_data ** VertexDatas;"? For shame, you two. For shame.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dmmfix1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dmmfix
@dmmfix@cmuratori ...I was gonna bring that up! In fact the docs *specifically* mention the Vertices/VertexCount example as "because OCD".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dmmfix
@dmmfix@rygorous@tom_forsyth Looking back at the code, I guess it's true that you didn't have to do that, so I take it back.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@dmmfix@rygorous@tom_forsyth You declared them together in the data layout, but you didn't name the count! So they didn't have to match.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dmmfix @rygorous @tom_forsyth So I guess I don't know why it's that way. Probably I had a reason. It may not have been a good reason :P
10:28 PM - 12 Mar 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.