@sssmcgrath @cmuratori I bet something like that was proposed at one point. We need some equivalent of Rule 34 for C++ standard proposals.
-
-
Replying to @pervognsen
@pervognsen@sssmcgrath Fucking C++. How do you miss a feature like that? Please@Jonathan_Blow finish JAI sometime soon!!!2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow There's probably something deep withing the mess of C++ that would have a namespace conflict with it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sssmcgrath
@sssmcgrath@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow But they could've just had a function name attribute for it, right. God damn it people.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow It took what? 10? 15? years to parse template <template C<T>> correctly2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sssmcgrath
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow or whatever the that stupid syntax is.. the >> wasn't allowed until I think 13 years after templates1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sssmcgrath
@sssmcgrath@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow Yeah, the "maximum munch" rule.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow remember "export" ? what a stupid fucking language.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sssmcgrath
@sssmcgrath@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow It's pretty bad.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow and yet I've written literally millions of lines of code in it... I guess I'm just as stupid.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@sssmcgrath @pervognsen @Jonathan_Blow Like many things, it doesn't work very well, but we've yet to develop a superior alternative :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.