Wait, does C++ _still_ not have a way to say that calls to a class member function should bring in the scope of the class for the args???
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori I'm just missing some special new keyword or something, right guys? RIGHT????1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Any minute now guys, you can reply to this tweet and tell me I'm just missing the feature. ANY MINUTE NOW...3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori I don't actually understand what the question means...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sssmcgrath
@sssmcgrath@cmuratori If I understand Casey correctly, he's looking for name-dependent lookup but with classes instead of namespaces?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
@sssmcgrath@cmuratori I bet something like that was proposed at one point. We need some equivalent of Rule 34 for C++ standard proposals.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pervognsen
@pervognsen@sssmcgrath Fucking C++. How do you miss a feature like that? Please@Jonathan_Blow finish JAI sometime soon!!!2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow There's probably something deep withing the mess of C++ that would have a namespace conflict with it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sssmcgrath
@sssmcgrath@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow But they could've just had a function name attribute for it, right. God damn it people.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow It took what? 10? 15? years to parse template <template C<T>> correctly2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@sssmcgrath @pervognsen @Jonathan_Blow Hey man, text input is hard! There's only been _half a fucking century_ of research on it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.