Wait, does C++ _still_ not have a way to say that calls to a class member function should bring in the scope of the class for the args???
@sssmcgrath @pervognsen @Jonathan_Blow But they could've just had a function name attribute for it, right. God damn it people.
-
-
@sssmcgrath@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow Everyone's a winner.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow It took what? 10? 15? years to parse template <template C<T>> correctly -
@cmuratori@pervognsen@Jonathan_Blow or whatever the that stupid syntax is.. the >> wasn't allowed until I think 13 years after templates - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.