Wait, does C++ _still_ not have a way to say that calls to a class member function should bring in the scope of the class for the args???
@sssmcgrath
class blah
{
enum {foo};
bar(int x);
};
blah B;
http://B.bar (foo); // FIND THE ENUM PLEASE
-
-
@cmuratori o.. nope! blah::foo is required.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori I've always said the meaning of any given C++ LOC could use more obfuscationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cmuratori@sssmcgrath You propose something analogous to ADL? E.g., for http://B.bar (e1,..,eN), we look for e1...eN in B? Then... -
@cmuratori@sssmcgrath ... for A<C1,...,CN>::f(e), should we look for e in A,C1,...,CN? - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.