@cmuratori @paniq @jwatte Anyway, SCTP is proof by contradiction, and you haven't mounted an argument against it, so I guess we win?
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@paniq@jwatte Because for all I know, the only reason anyone would say that is because they know it is normally in-order.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@paniq@jwatte Unfortunately, there don't seem to be many out-of-order protocols at all to find counterexamples with.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@paniq@jwatte So what is the term for something which only does the first half of the wikipedia definition?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@nothings@paniq So we all agree that "just send packets until ack" is not actually a robust protocol at internet scale?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jwatte1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@jwatte@nothings@paniq I think you probably want something more like a torrent, where you just send bitmask requests...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@jwatte@nothings@paniq ... and the sender assumes they'll get another bitmask request eventually if something failed.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.