@cmuratori @paniq @jwatte Sigh. UDP is connectionless. A TCP-like protocol defined on top of UDP *is not connectionless*. #learn2layer
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@paniq@jwatte Because hopefully we agree that you can have congestion control on an out-of-order protocol.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@paniq@jwatte Absolutely. You just need to be keeping track of state w/ regards to other end points. (Called 'a connection'.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@paniq@jwatte And the CurveCP page I linked to.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nothings
@cmuratori@paniq@jwatte And your page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection-oriented_communication … lists SCTP, and SCTP page points out SCTP can be layered on top of UDP.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@paniq@jwatte Obviously you guys are more lax about what is required, and that's fine, you know, if you're all loosey-goosey.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori@paniq@jwatte Anyway, SCTP is proof by contradiction, and you haven't mounted an argument against it, so I guess we win?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@nothings@paniq@jwatte Because for all I know, the only reason anyone would say that is because they know it is normally in-order.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.