Not to be overly picky, but I feel there could have been a better syntax than asm volatile("" ::: "memory"); for memory barriers :(
-
-
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori I mean, not that it isn't lovely, it's just... you know _maybe_ we could have refined it just a _bit_.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmuratori
@cmuratori Its perfectly inline with modern C++ in its total and utter obfuscation of what its doing. Memory is volatile after all !? :)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rompa69
@rompa69@cmuratori well to be fair that's just GCC arcana, it's not C++, the syntax is the same in C. Windows uses pretty clear intrinsics.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @bionicbeagle
@bionicbeagle @rompa69 Yes, this has nothing to do with C. It's a compiler situation.
11:12 AM - 2 Nov 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.